Legal Opinion

Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 20, 1991No. 89-1799PublishedCited by 957 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy

In this libel case, a public figure claims he was defamed by an author who, with full knowledge of the inaccuracy, used quotation marks to attribute to him comments he had not made. The First Amendment protects authors and journalists who write about public figures by requiring a plaintiff to prove that the defamatory statements were made with what we have called “actual malice,” a term of art denoting deliberate or reckless falsification. We consider in this opinion whether the attributed quotations had the degree of falsity required to prove this state of mind, so that the public figure can…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by957 opinions

  1. Waters v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Schatz v. Republican State Leadership CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  3. Liberman v. GelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Bentley v. BuntonTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Robert Van Buskirk, M.D.L., 1257, in Re Cable News Network v. Cable News Network, Inc., Time Inc., and Time Warner Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

952 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API