Legal Opinion

Varnado v. Midland Funding LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 15, 2014No. C-13-05705 DMRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [DOCKET NO. 15]

DONNA M. RYU, United States Magistrate Judge

Defendants Midland Credit Management, Inc. (“MCM”) and Midland Funding, LLC (“MF”) (collectively, “Midland”) have filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [Docket No. 15.] Midland seeks dismissal of Plaintiff Karen Varnado’s state law causes of action for negligence and intru*988sion upon seclusion, and Plaintiffs requests for punitive damages and declaratory and injunctive relief under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Williams v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Barefield v. HSBC Holdings PLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  3. CS Wang & Assoc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Alapati v. City and County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  5. Beatty v. PHH Mortgage CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API