Legal Opinion
Beckjord v. Slusher
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 28, 1937No. Civ. No. 11512PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Plaintiff appeals from:(1) A judgment for $500 in his favor after trial by jury in an action to recover from defendants as principal and sureties on an indemnity bond.(2) An order striking his cost bill.
The essential facts are:
Defendant Silas F. Slusher commenced an action in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County against Ben H. Chamberlain and Chauncey W. Chamberlain and attached certain personal property. Plaintiff filed a claim for the release of the attached property, claiming to have a chattel mortgage thereon. Thereafter defendant Silas F. Slusher as principal and his eodefendants as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moore v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Eastman v. Sunset Park Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Lady v. PalenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Leaper v. GandyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bondanza v. Peninsula Hospital & Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Greenbach Bros., Inc. v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Hollinger v. MedinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Bondanza v. Peninsula Hospital & Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979