Eastman v. Sunset Park Land Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtConret, P. J.
The plaintiff being the owner of a promissory note made by the defendant Sunset Park Land Com-. pany in favor of defendant T. G. Rickman, brought this action and obtained judgment, from which the Sunset Park Land Company appeals. It is admitted that the judgment should be sustained if the note was a negotiable instrument. Appellant contends that the note was not a negotiable instrument because by its terms it was made payable “in U. S. gold coin,” and because it contains an agreement that “in case suit is instituted to collect this note or any portion thereof, we promise to pay such…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Prescott v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bondanza v. Peninsula Hospital & Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Mente & Co. v. Fresno Compress & Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Greenbach Bros., Inc. v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Manatee Loan & Mortgage Co. v. Manley's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.