Lady v. Palen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McCOMB, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff appeals from an order striking out his cost bill after he obtained judgment in a libel action for the sum of $1 nominal damages and $200 punitive and exemplary damages.
This is the question presented for determination:
Is the plaintiff in a libel action, who recovers a judgment for less than $2,000, entitled to have taxed as items of cost:(1) The sum of $100 to cover counsel fees under section 7 of Act 4317 of the state legislature, volume II, Deering's General Laws, 1931, page 2161, and(2) Other expenses incurred.
The first item is not properly taxable according to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Logan v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Newcomb v. Title Guarante & Trust CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Jacobi v. BaurCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Rapfogel v. KlassenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by6 opinions
- Truelsen v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Puccetti v. GirolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Bardeen v. Commander Oil Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Leaper v. GandyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Rogers v. County Bank of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.