Legal Opinion

Moore v. Maryland Casualty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 1929No. Docket No. 3735PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in an action on an indemnity bond for damages resulting from an order temporarily restraining the owners from interfering with the harvesting and marketing of a grape crop.

Respondents are the owners of eleven acres of vineyard land in San Joaquin County, upon which there was growing, in 1926, a crop of grapes. E. G. Potter, as receiver of the Stewart Fruit Company, brought an action to foreclosé a chattel mortgage on said crop. A temporary restraining order was granted prohibiting these respondents from interfering with the harvesting and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Asevado v. OrrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Spencer v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Mitchell v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Curtiss v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Dowling v. PolackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Melnyk v. RobledoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles-Inyo Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Sheridan County Electric Co-Op., Inc. v. FergusonMontana Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Mason v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API