Legal Opinion

Bondanza v. Peninsula Hospital & Medical Center

California Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1979No. S.F. 23841Published

1Opinion of the Court

23 Cal.3d 260 (1979)

590 P.2d 22

152 Cal. Rptr. 446

CATHERINE M. BONDANZA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

PENINSULA HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Docket No. S.F. 23841.

Supreme Court of California.

February 8, 1979.

COUNSEL

Carol R. Golubock and Thomas R. Adams for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Carr, McClellan, Ingersoll, Thompson & Horn and David C. Carr for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

MOSK, J.

The issue in this case is whether a hospital is guilty of an unlawful or unfair business practice (former Civ. Code, § 3369; now Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) if…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Coast & Southern Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. City of Vernon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Brunton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Ecco-Phoenix Electric Corp. v. Howard J. White, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Chastain v. BelmontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API