Legal Opinion
Lieppman v. Lieber
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 9, 1986No. B014958PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, P. J.
Julius Lieber and his attorneys, the law firm of George & Collins (hereafter Lieber), appeal from the trial court’s order granting the request of respondents Michael Lieppman and Lorraine Lieppman (hereafter Lieppman) for $2,500 as a sanction for frivolously moving for a change of venue.
Lieber worked as Lieppman’s accountant in Long Beach between 1979 and 1983. On July 13, 1984, Lieppman filed a complaint against Lieber, claiming that Lieber had done a poor job, to his detriment. Lieber, who had previously moved to Los Osos, in San Luis Obispo County, answered through his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Young v. RedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Star Motor Imports, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Mission Imports, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Fegles v. KraftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- West Coast Development v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Southern Christian Leadership Conference v. Al Malaikah Auditorium Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Jansen Associates, Inc. v. Codercard, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Tad Imuta v. Takaaki NakanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Weisman v. BowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.