Legal Opinion

Jansen Associates, Inc. v. Codercard, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1990No. G007831PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAYLOR, J. *

This appeal is from an order imposing sanctions against an attorney for wilfully failing to attend mandatory arbitration. While the attorney’s failure to attend was in bad faith, frivolous and caused unnecessary delay, we conclude the order imposing sanctions was deficient.

Facts

During the course of litigation, the parties and their attorneys were ordered to attend mandatory arbitration proceedings. Plaintiff Jansen Associates, Inc., and its attorney, Paul J. Weinberg, prepared for and attended the arbitration hearing at considerable time and expense. Defendant Coder-card,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Ellis v. Roshei Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Lavine v. Hospital of the Good SamaritanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Tate v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Lyons v. WickhorstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Childs v. PAINE WEBBER INCORPORATEDCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. West Coast Development v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Petropoulos v. PetropoulosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. People v. Lam ChoiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Javor v. DellingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API