Star Motor Imports, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, Acting P. J.
We issued an alternative writ of mandate in
this matter upon a representation that the superior court, at a trial de novo on a small claims court appeal, expressly permitted hearsay testimony by the respondent therein, contrary to Evidence Code section 1200 and California Rules of Court, rule 155. But we have concluded that the writ was improvidently issued by us for the reason that the application therefor was fatally defective. The proceeding will, for the reasons we now proceed to state, be dismissed.
The case points up a problem of concern in the rapidly…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Dare v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Lemelle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Franklin v. Nat C. Goldstone AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Fall River Joint Unified School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Magnolia Square Homeowners Ass'n v. Safeco InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Kendall v. BarkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.