Legal Opinion
Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.
California Supreme Court
Decided May 22, 1944No. S. F. 16814PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiffs instituted an action for rescission or damages based on the alleged fraudulent procurement of the termination of an agency contract and the sale by them to defendant Ex-Cello-0 Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Ex-Cell-O) of shares of capital stock of Sealed-Pure Systems, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as Sealed-Pure). Judgment in the trial court was in favor of the defendants. The plaintiffs appealed. •
The question presented is whether the findings of the trial court are supported by the evidence and furnish support for the judgment.
On October 30, 1937, plaintiff…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Brea v. McGlashanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Pacific Steam Whaling Co. v. Alaska Packers' Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Hacker Pipe & Supply Co. v. Chapman Valve Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Clemente v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Bedolla v. Logan & FrazerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Zinn v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Brandon & Tibbs v. George Kevorkian Accountancy Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.