Legal Opinion
Lamb v. Harbaugh
California Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1895No. 19351PublishedCited by 39 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The complaint in this action is against seventeen defendants, and is in the following language:
“ 1. That on the twenty-fourth day of August, 1892, the plaintiff was, and had been for many years, a resident of the city of Rational City, in the county of San Diego, state of California.
“ 2. That on the night of the twenty-third and twenty-fourth day of August, 1892, she was residing in said city, in her dwelling-house, with her daughters, Cora E. Lamb and Grace Lamb, and her son, Charles Lamb, and was the owner and in the peaceable and quiet possession of said dwelling-house and the lot upon…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- McFadden v. Santa Ana, Orange, & Tustin Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Touchard v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- In re Estate of PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Grandona v. LovdalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Vasu v. Kohlers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
- Pacific Steam Whaling Co. v. Alaska Packers' Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Paine v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Franklin v. FranklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Basler v. Sacramento Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.