Gregson v. U.S. Forestry Service
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EISELE, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendants’ and in-tervenors’ separate Motions for Summary Judgment. The movants contend that, based upon the Administrative Record below, they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law in this action arising under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-06 (“APA”); the National Forest Management Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4321, et seq. (“NFMA”); National Environmental Policy Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1600, et seq. (“NEPA”); and the Land Resource Management Plan for the Ozark-St. Francis National…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Darby v. CisnerosSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sierra Club-Black Hills Group v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Chattooga River Watershed Coalition v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2000
- Sierra Club-Black Hills Group v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Sokol v. KennedyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1999