Legal Opinion
Darby v. Cisneros
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 21, 1993No. 91-2045PublishedCited by 572 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun
* This case presents the question whether federal courts have the authority to require that a plaintiff exhaust available administrative remedies before seeking judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U. S. C. § 701 et seq., where neither the statute nor agency rules specifically mandate exhaustion as a prerequisite to judicial re- ' view. At issue is the relationship between the judicially created doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies and the statutory requirements of § 10(c) of the APA.
I
Petitioner R. Gordon Darby 2 is a self-employed South Carolina real…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by572 opinions
- Trump v. J. G. G.Supreme Court of the United States · 2025
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Turner v. BurnsideCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Bangura v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
567 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.