Sokol v. Kennedy
District Court, D. Nebraska
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BATAILLON, District Judge.
Before me are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (Filing Nos. 47 [defendants] and 49 [plaintiff]). The plaintiff claims jurisdiction for this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1346(b). The plaintiffs amended complaint (Filing No. 52) seeks a declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 that the National Park Service 1) failed adequately to consider a. bank-to-bank boundary alternative for the Niobrara Scenic River, and 2) failed to use the “outstandingly remarkable” standard of review when determining whether land adjacent to or…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.