Legal Opinion

Sokol v. Kennedy

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided February 22, 1999No. 8:97CV51Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BATAILLON, District Judge.

Before me are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment (Filing Nos. 47 [defendants] and 49 [plaintiff]). The plaintiff claims jurisdiction for this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1346(b). The plaintiffs amended complaint (Filing No. 52) seeks a declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 that the National Park Service 1) failed adequately to consider a. bank-to-bank boundary alternative for the Niobrara Scenic River, and 2) failed to use the “outstandingly remarkable” standard of review when determining whether land adjacent to or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API