Legal Opinion
Collins & Aikman Corp. v. J. P. Stevens & Co.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided January 4, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 70-9PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
The defendant herein has moved pursuant to Rule 45, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the production of documents contained in the files of Deering Milliken, Inc. concerning the patents disputed in the above action. At the hearing of the matter, Deering Milliken and the plaintiff herein objected to the requested production upon the grounds that many of the documents requested were within the attorney-client privilege and/or beyond the scope of allowable discovery because they constitute work product. The second general ground of the objection was that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Natta v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1954
- Georgia-Pacific Plywood Co. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- American Cyanamid Company v. Hercules Powder CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1962
- In Re Natta, Movant, in the United States Patent Office Before the Examiner of Interferences, Interference No. 89634. Hogan v. Zletz v. Baxter v. Natta Natta, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
- Dart Industries Company, Inc., Movant-Appellee v. Westwood Chemical Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings In Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.