Legal Opinion
Kozlowski v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 6, 1976No. Civ. A. No. 75-1370-JPublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COURT’S RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REMOVE DEFAULT JUDGMENT
JULIAN, Senior District Judge.
A brief statement of the prior events in this case suffices to explain the present posture of the defendant’s motion to remove the default judgment.
Plaintiff, a minor, was severely burned on November 11, 1970, in Royal Oak, Michigan, when a pair of pajamas allegedly manufactured and marketed by defendant was “cause to ignite” (Plaintiff’s Complaint, Count # 6). Plaintiff commenced this product liability action on April 9, 1975, asserting claims sounding in negligence, breach of warranty, and strict…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- In Re Air Crash Disaster at Boston, Massachusetts on July 31, 1973District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. CatonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Webb v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Snowden v. Connaught Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Wagner v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2001
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.