Legal Opinion

State v. Piotrowski

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 14, 2014No. Nos. 1 CA-CR 12-0255, 1 CA-CR 12-0790PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOULD, Judge.

¶ 1 Robert Michael Piotrowski (“Defendant”) appeals from the sentences imposed by the trial court. We affirm for the reasons discussed below.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 A jury found Defendant guilty of aggravated assault, a class two dangerous felony, and possession of dangerous drugs, a class four non-dangerous felony (the “2012 convictions”). At the time Defendant was convicted of these 2012 offenses, he was on probation in two prior cases (the “2008 convictions”).

¶ 3 At sentencing, the trial court imposed concurrent, presumptive prison terms for the 2012 convictions. The court also…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. State v. RushingArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. State v. BarksdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. ABCDW LLC v. BanningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  2. McKee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API