State v. Piotrowski
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Judge.
¶ 1 Robert Michael Piotrowski (“Defendant”) appeals from the sentences imposed by the trial court. We affirm for the reasons discussed below.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 A jury found Defendant guilty of aggravated assault, a class two dangerous felony, and possession of dangerous drugs, a class four non-dangerous felony (the “2012 convictions”). At the time Defendant was convicted of these 2012 offenses, he was on probation in two prior cases (the “2008 convictions”).
¶ 3 At sentencing, the trial court imposed concurrent, presumptive prison terms for the 2012 convictions. The court also…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. RushingArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- State v. BarksdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ABCDW LLC v. BanningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- McKee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016