State v. Rushing
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MOELLER, Justice.
JURISDICTION
Defendant Gregory Rushing appeals from his convictions and sentences for aggravated assault, misdemeanor assault, burglary, and theft. On appeal, he makes two contentions:
1. The trial court erred in admitting photographs showing the victims’ injuries; and
2. The trial court erred in failing to advise the defendant that the sentences imposed in the instant case would be consecutive to the sentences imposed in the cases where he violated his probation.
On these two issues, we find no error and affirm the convictions and sentences on the aggravated assault count, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HensleyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. AllieArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Acheson v. ShafterArizona Supreme Court · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SpearsArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State of Arizona v. Mark Noriki KasicCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State v. GrannisArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BocharskiArizona Supreme Court · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.