Legal Opinion

State v. Barksdale

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 4, 1984No. 1 CA-CR 7088PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Judge.

This is an appeal by the Yuma County Attorney (State) from the sentences imposed against the appellee where the State contends that the sentences are illegal. A.R.S. § 13-4032(6). Appellee Barksdale was sentenced to serve two years in prison for the crime of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor while his license was suspended, a class 5 felony in violation of A.R.S. § 28-692.02 (DWI). It is undisputed that appellee was on probation for other felony crimes when he committed the felony offense described above.

The record shows that appellee pled guilty to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Pickett v. BoykinArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. RisherArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. RiosArizona Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coy v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. State v. RushingArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. MuldoonArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. MathieuCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. McDonald v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API