Legal Opinion

Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 29, 2004No. 1 CA-TX 02-0021PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 Nordstrom, Inc. and Scottsdale Fashion Square Partnership (“SFSP”) (collectively “Taxpayers”) appeal the property tax valuations for the Nordstrom department store (the “Store”) in Scottsdale Fashion Square for the 1999 and 2000 tax years. We hold that the Store is not a “shopping center” as defined in Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 42-13201 (1999) for property tax valuation purposes. In addition, Mari-copa County cross-appeals the omission of entrepreneurial profit from the tax court’s calculation under the cost approach. We affirm the judgment of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. In Re Maricopa County Superior Court Number MH 2001-001139Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. In re United States Currency in the Amount of $315,900.00Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Steinberger v. McVeyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. NEW SUN BUSINESS PARK, LLC v. Yuma CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. Sholes v. FernandoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. SEMPRE LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. Harris Corp. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API