Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 10, 1996No. 1 CA-CR 95-0260PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge.

Kenneth Taylor (“defendant”) appeals the trial court’s revocation of his probations in three underlying causes. He contends that the trial court erred by concluding that it was required to impose prison terms. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On January 7, 1994, defendant was adjudged guilty of one count of possession of a dangerous drug, one count of attempted sale of a dangerous drug, 1 and one count of theft. The trial court suspended the imposition of sentence on all three convictions and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. YslasArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. MilkeArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. KempArizona Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. Resendis-FelixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. State v. BarrazaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. State v. BurdickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. State v. BanickiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API