Legal Opinion
Bloom v. Gershon
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 14, 2004No. 17030, 17031, 17032PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the claims commissioner has jurisdiction, pur suant to General Statutes § 4-160, 1 to waive the state’s sovereign immunity and grant a claimant permission to file an apportionment complaint, pursuant to General Statutes § 52-102b, 2 against the state of Connecticut in the Superior Court. We conclude that the claims com missioner does not have such jurisdiction. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court to the contrary.
The plaintiffs, Gerald Bloom and Sandra Bloom, brought this medical malpractice action against the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Miles v. FoleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Lostritto v. Community Action Agency of New Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Krozser v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gold v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- D'ERAMO v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Gordon v. HNS MANAGEMENT CO., INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Tuchman v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Bolmer v. OliveiraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.