Legal Opinion
Miles v. Foley
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 6, 2000No. SC 16210PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a planning and zoning commission’s rejection of a subdivision application constitutes action within *383the meaning of General Statutes § 8-26.1 This is a mandamus action brought by the plaintiff, Jesse Miles, trustee, against the defendants, the New Canaan planning and zoning commission (commission), its former chairman, James H. Bennett, and the town planner, Daniel A. Foley, and the intervening defendants, Phillip L. Knapp, James Rae, Jane Delano and Warren Delano,2 who own properties adjacent to and across the street from the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Winchester Woods Associates v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Witt v. St. Vincent's Medical CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Butts v. BysiewiczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Bloom v. GershonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Cunha v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Grasso v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Groton Long Point Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Sewer CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.