Legal Opinion

Bolmer v. Oliveira

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 5, 2008No. 3:06-mc-00235PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Brett Bolmer commenced this action in 2006, challenging his temporary involuntary commitment, physical restraint, and involuntary injection with medication at Danbury Hospital in 2004. Mr. Bolmer has asserted a variety of Constitutional, statutory, and common law tort claims against the defendants, who now move for summary judgment on all claims. For the reasons set forth below, the State defendants’ motion for summary judgment will be denied, and the Danbury Hospital defendants’ motion for summary…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McGugan v. Aldana-BernierCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  2. Bolmer v. OliveiraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  3. Julian v. Mission Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Britt v. Buffalo Municipal Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011
  5. Julian v. Mission Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API