DeBoer v. Brown
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GORDON, Vice Chief Justice:
The facts before us are uncontested for purposes of this review. In August, 1976, Calvin L. Dotson, the plaintiff below, was being treated for various skin problems by dermatologist Daniel C. DeBoer, M.D., the defendant below. DeBoer excised a skin sample from a lesion on Dotson’s back. The sample was mounted onto a slide, examined by DeBoer, and diagnosed as a compound nevus or common wart. Dotson was told of the diagnosis and that he need not undergo further examination or treatment of the “wart.” From August, 1976 until April, 1980, Dotson neither saw nor felt…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richard Augustine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Larcher v. WanlessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Tresemer v. BarkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Mayer v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Landgraff v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Paul v. SkempWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Hershberger v. Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Burns v. Jaquays Mining Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Amfac Distribution Corp. v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.