Legal Opinion
Richard Augustine v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 26, 1983No. 80-5472PublishedCited by 487 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Richard Augustine brought an action for damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) 1 for the alleged malpractice of Air Force dental surgeons. The Government filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on Augustine’s alleged failure to comply in a timely manner with the administrative claim requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b) (1976). 2 The district court granted the motion and dismissed the action. 3 We reverse.
I. FACTS
In September 1975, Augustine was examined by Lieutenant Colonel Wysocki, a United States Air Force dentist,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Victor M. Hungerford, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Glynn Richard Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Marcella Csibi, Ludovic Csibi, Aurora Csibi and Maria Csibi v. Gizela Fustos, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Rudolfo Ramirez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by487 opinions
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Kerns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Cna v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Lowe v. City of MonroviaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
482 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.