Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Good Samaritan Hospital

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 17, 1971No. 1 CA-CIV 1152PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

The only issue presented in this appeal is when does a cause of action for personal injuries arising out of a malpractice action “accrue” for purpose of causing the running of the statute of limitations to commence.

On March 13, 1964, the plaintiff-appellant, Francine Rae Mayer, was admitted to Good Samaritan Hospital in Phoenix, Arizona, for the induced delivery of her first child. Mrs. Mayer had previously been under the treatment of Doctors Sattenspiel and Ernst for both pre-natal care and a pre-existing diabetic condition. Following an uneventful delivery, Mrs.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Hatsumi Yoshizaki v. Hilo HospitalHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Morrison v. ActonArizona Supreme Court · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Doe v. RoeArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Myrick v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. Foil v. BallingerUtah Supreme Court · 1979

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API