Legal Opinion

Hershberger v. Akron City Hospital

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1987No. 86-1544PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The narrow question presented upon appeal is whether appellants’ complaint was filed in a timely fashion. We first consider the cause of action alleged by appellant Rickey Hershberger, and whether his claim was timely filed pursuant to R.C. 2305.11(A) and/or 2305.11(B). For the reasons which follow, we reverse the judgments below and remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

I

Recently this court decided the cases of Hardy v. VerMeulen (1987), 32 Ohio St. 3d 45, 512 N.E. 2d 626, and Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. (1987), 33 Ohio St. 3d 54, 514 N.E.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Morrison v. ChanTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Gaddis v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Oliver v. Kaiser Community Health FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Zimmie v. Calfee, Halter & GriswoldOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Investors REIT One v. JacobsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Flowers v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Browning v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Omni-Food & Fashion, Inc. v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1988

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API