Legal Opinion

Amfac Distribution Corp. v. Miller

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1983No. 16690-PRPublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Vice Chief Justice:

The facts in this matter are fully set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, Amfac Distribution Corp. v. Miller, 138 Ariz. 155, 673 P.2d 795 (1983), and will not be repeated here. The issue before us is when a cause of action accrues for legal malpractice which occurs during the course of litigation. 1 The Court of Appeals held that the cause of action in such a situation accrues “when the plaintiff knew or should reasonably have known of the malpractice and when the plaintiff’s damages are certain and not contingent upon the outcome of an appeal.” Id. at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sato v. Van DenburghArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Amfac Distribution Corp. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Morrison v. ActonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  4. DeBoer v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Long v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hughes v. Mahaney & HigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Knight v. FurlowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Schoenrock v. TappeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1996

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API