Legal Opinion

Yost-Linn Lumber Co. v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1932No. Docket No. 8269PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

These actionsto foreclose materialmen’s liens were consolidated for trial and from the judgment entered therein the defendant Frances Nusewander has appealed. There is no dispute about the facts, and the sole question of law involved is whether, as the trial court held, the liens of the materialmen were superior to a portion of the mortgage lien held by the defendant Frances Nusewander.

According to the admitted facts, the defendants Ray and Emily Williams, in order to finance the construction of a building on a lot of which they were the owners, obtained from the Wilshire Mortgage Corporation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Smith v. Anglo-California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Tapia v. DemartiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. W. P. Fuller & Co. v. McClureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Fickling v. JackmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dockrey v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. NaslundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Lumber & Builders Supply Co. v. RitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Turner v. Lytton Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API