Tapia v. Demartini
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sierra County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
Suit was brought by the plaintiff against certain of the defendants to dissolve a partnership alleged to exist between them in carrying on the business of mining, and to close up and adjust the partnership affairs. Subsequently, numerous other parties, who claimed to hold liens against the property of the copartnership, were made defendants, and set up, by way of answer, their respective claims of liens, most of which were mechanics’ liens, for labor performed on the mining property of the firm.
The defendants, Busch, Mooney, Castagnetto, and Sorocco, also filed their cross-complaint,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shirras & Others v. Caig & MitchelSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Ackerman v. . HunsickerNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Wood v. WeimarSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Lovelace v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Brooks v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Smith v. Anglo-California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Union Bank v. WendlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- City of Santa Monica v. Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BurtonWashington Supreme Court · 1899
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.