Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Dozorc

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1981No. Docket Nos. 61534, 61547. (Calendar No. 2)PublishedCited by 219 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The plaintiff is a physician who, after successfully defending in a medical malpractice action, brought this action against the attorneys who had represented the plaintiffs in the former action. Dr. Friedman sought under a number of theories to recover damages for being compelled to defend against an allegedly groundless medical malpractice action. The trial court granted the defendants’ motions for summary and accelerated judgment.

The Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part. We granted leave to appeal to consider what remedies may be available to a physician who brings such a…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by219 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Miller v. Sanilac CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Snyder v. Icard, Merrill, Cullis, Timm, Furen & Ginsburg, P.A.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Mozzochi v. BeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

214 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API