Legal Opinion

Ritter v. BEALS

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1961PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Carrie Ritter, from a judgment n.o.v. in favor of the defendants in an action for damages resulting from an accident. The defendants have cross-appealed, assigning error to certain rulings made during the trial.

The jury having found for the plaintiff, it is necessary first to review the record in order to determine whether the court erred in entering judgment n.o.v.

Mrs. Ritter was injured on May 27, 1956, while in the course of her employment as a practical nurse and housekeeper for the defendant Beals, who was an 84-year-old invalid confined to a wheel…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Meistrich v. Casino Arena Attractions, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Schweiger v. SolbeckOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Goldfoot v. LofgrenOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Staples v. SendersOregon Supreme Court · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Rosas v. Buddies Food StoreTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Rutter v. Northeastern Beaver County School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Rosenau Ex Rel. Rosenau v. City of EsthervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  5. Williamson v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API