Black v. Wilkinson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
Taking the plaintiff’s evidence as true, as we are required to do in considering the correctness of the judgment of nonsuit, it is sufficient to support a finding of negligence by the defendant, which was the proximate cause of the collisions. Driving into the plaintiff’s lane of travel under such circumstances would constitute negligence by the defendant. G.S. 20-154(a); Raper v. Byrum, 265 N.C. 269, 144 S.E. 2d 38. Sugg v. Baker, 261 N.C. 579, 135 S.E. 2d 565; Tart v. Register, 257 N.C. 161, 125 S.E. 2d 754; Mitchell v. White, 256 N.C. 437, 124 S.E. 2d 137.
A judgment of nonsuit may not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pruett v. InmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Tart v. RegisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Bondurant v. MastinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Raper v. ByrumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Mitchell v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Anderson v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Collins v. ChristenberryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Hill v. ShanksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Ford v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.