Legal Opinion

Tart v. Register

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1962No. 530PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooRE, J.

Appellants make nineteen assignments of error based on fifty-seven exceptions. Many of the exceptions and assignments are not brought forward in their brief, and these are deemed abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 254 N.C. 810. Of those brought forward in the brief, several merit discussion.(1) Appellants demurred to the complaints on the ground that they do not state sufficient facts to constitute causes of action as to defendants Jernigan in that “it appears upon the face of the complaint (s) that the sole proximate cause of the motor vehicle collision . . . was the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Long v. LandySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Southwestern Fire and Casualty Company v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. Severson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Cooley v. BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Daniel v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Yarrington v. ThornburgSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
  2. State v. DeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Baxley v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Smith v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Young v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API