Legal Opinion

Ford v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1969No. 6927SC510PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGbaham, J.

The parties do not dispute the fact that sufficient evidence was presented to take the case to the jury on the issue of defendant’s actionable negligence. Therefore, the only question before us is whether plaintiff’s evidence establishes as a matter of law his own negligence as one of the proximate causes of his injury. Jernigan v. R. R. Co., 275 N.C. 277, 167 S.E. 2d 269.

The judgment of nonsuit cannot be sustained unless the plaintiff’s evidence, considered in the light most favorable to him, so clearly establishes his own negligence as one of the proximate causes of his injury that no other…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Anderson v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Rodgers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Maddox v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Currin v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seaman v. McQueenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Rozier v. LancasterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API