Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Dubois v. Gradco Systems, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 2, 1991No. Civ. No. B-89-437 (JAC)PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, District Judge:

The question presented, apparently for the first time in any Federal or state court in Connecticut,1 is whether Rule 4.2 of the Connecticut Rules of Professional Conduct—which prohibits a lawyer representing a client from communicating about the subject of the representation with an adverse party represented by another lawyer without the consent of that other lawyer— prohibits communications with a former employee of an adverse corporate party without the consent of the corporation’s lawyer.

The complaint in this case…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bulow v. BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Polycast Technology Corp. v. Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  3. Amarin Plastics, Inc. v. Maryland Cup Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
  4. Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. Associated Electric & Gas Insurance ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  5. Curley v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Miano v. AC & R Advertising, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  2. Valassis v. SamelsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
  3. Action Air Freight, Inc. v. Pilot Air Freight Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Brown v. St. Joseph CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
  5. Aiken v. Business and Industry Health Group, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API