Legal Opinion
Curley v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 28, 1991No. Civ. No. 86-5057 (SSB)PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge.
In a opinion and order dated November 16, 1990, the Honorable Jerome B. Simandle, United States Magistrate, denied defendants’ motion for a protective order pursuant to Rule 4.2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct (“RPC”). Defendants sought to preclude plaintiffs’ counsel from contacting former Cumberland Farm Loss Prevention Specialists ex parte. Subject to certain guidelines, the Magistrate’s order permits plaintiffs’ counsel to contact former Loss Prevention Specialists ex parte. Presently before the court is defendants’ appeal from the that order.
*79I. FACTS…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Rebecca J. Schofield v. First Commodity Corporation of Boston, Rebecca J. Schofield v. First Commodity Corporation of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Petro-Tech, Inc. v. Western Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Andrews v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Hanntz v. Shiley, Inc. a Div. of Pfizer, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- Camden v. State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1996
- Klier v. Sordoni Skanska Const. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- State v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.