Legal Opinion

Valassis v. Samelson

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 2, 1992No. 91-CV-74029PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO USE AND INTERVIEW MARY BAER AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

ROSEN, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Permission to Use and Interview Mary Baer and Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order.

The instant issue was first raised by the parties in letters filed with the Court. Oral argument was heard on May 14, 1992. At that time, the Court decided to consider the parties’ letters as their motions. It also permitted the parties to file supplemental briefs on the issues…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Millie B. Heathman v. United States District Court for the Central District of California,respondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. Wright v. Group Health HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Hayes-Albion Corp. v. KuberskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Camden v. State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  2. McCallum v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1993
  3. Brown v. St. Joseph CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
  4. Aiken v. Business and Industry Health Group, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
  5. Infosystems, Inc. v. Ceridian Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API