Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. United States Bureau of Prisons
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 7, 1997No. Civil Action 95-1460 (RMU)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Denying Plaintiffs Motion to Amend the Complaint and Granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pro se plaintiff Ann Armstrong brings this action seeking damages from the United States Bureau of Prison (“BOP”), several named and unnamed federal agencies, 1 and unnamed individuals under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (1996). Plaintiff claims that the BOP denied her the right to access and amend her prison records as provided for under the Privacy Act. This matter comes before the court on defendant BOP’s summary judgment;…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kursar v. Transportation Security AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Cloonan v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Truesdale v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Doe v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Doe v. U.S. Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.