Legal Opinion
Truesdale v. United States Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 29, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1862 (PLF)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss. 1 The Court has considered the motion and plaintiffs opposition thereto, and will grant defendants’ motion in part and deny it in part.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Plaintiffs Conviction and Sentence
“On February 6, 1992, the grand jury for the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina returned a thirty count indictment against twenty-one individuals, charging nineteen of them with participation in a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wilson v. FullwoodDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Truesdale v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Barroca v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Truesdale v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Barroca v. SamuelsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.