Legal Opinion

Maule v. ARIZ. SUPER. COURT FOR MARICOPA CTY

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 11, 1984No. 1 CA-CIV 7818-SAPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Presiding Judge.

This petition for special action raises the issue of whether the time limit of rule 12.9, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, is jurisdictional. By order of this court dated August 15, 1984 this court accepted jurisdiction of the special action and granted relief to the extent of ruling that the trial court had jurisdiction to grant the petitioner’s timely filed motion for extension of time to file a motion for new finding of probable cause pursuant to rule 12.9. This court further ordered that the respondent trial judge exercise his discretion as to whether to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. NeeseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  3. State v. HickleArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State v. VillarrealCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  2. Aztar Corp. v. U.S. Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. State v. RodriquezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. State v. MerolleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API