Legal Opinion

State v. Hickle

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1981No. 5157PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

This is an appeal by the State challenging the trial court’s grant of a new trial for the defendant, following a jury verdict of guilty to first degree murder. The defendant cross-appealed raising some six questions. During oral argument to this court defendant abandoned all but one of the six issues. We take jurisdiction under Rule 47(e)(2), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17A A.R.S.

We need decide, then, only two questions:

1. Did the trial court err in denying defendant’s motion for a directed verdict of acquittal?

2. Did the trial court err in granting defendant’s motion for a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. MosleyArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. PieckArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State v. MannCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. LandriganArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. JustCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. State of Arizona v. John Vincent FitzgeraldArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. HickleArizona Supreme Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API