Legal Opinion
Aztar Corp. v. U.S. Fire Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 28, 2010No. 1 CA-CV 08-0562PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARKER, Judge.
¶ 1 We address in this opinion, among other issues, what the term “interruption of business, whether total or partial” means in this contract of insurance.
Facts and Procedural History
1. Tropicana Expansion Project
¶ 2 At all times relevant to this appeal, Appellant Aztar Corporation (“Aztar”), a Phoenix-based corporation, owned and operated the Tropicana Casino and Resort (“Tropieana”) in Atlantic City, New Jersey. In 2002, Aztar began an expansion at a site adjacent to the Tropicana. The twenty-seven story expansion included dining, retail, and entertainment venues on the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Ipxl Holdings, L.L.C. v. Amazon.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bryant v. SilvermanArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Prince v. City of Apache JunctionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
- Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc. v. Zurich American Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Felipe v. Theme Tech Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Roe v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- ELM RETIREMENT CENTER, LP v. CallawayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.