Legal Opinion
State v. Neese
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 14, 1980No. 1 CA-CR 3880, 1 CA-CR 3873PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONOFRIO, Judge.
Appellants Albert Duran and Thomas W. Neese were convicted of conspiracy to violate the marijuana laws of Arizona, specifically A.R.S. § 13-331(A) as amended, and A.R.S. § 13-332. They were each sentenced to prison for a term of not less than four nor more than twelve years. In this consolidated appeal appellants challenge both their respective judgments of guilt and sentences.
REDETERMINATION OF PROBABLE CAUSE
Appellants contend that the trial court committed reversible error in denying their motion for redetermination of probable cause based upon claims of impropriety…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Ernest Raymond BasurtoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. JustCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State v. HaasArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. VeriveCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- State v. CharoArizona Supreme Court · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.