Legal Opinion

State v. Villarreal

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 14, 1983No. 2 CA-CR 2864PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

Appellee was convicted by a jury of attempted fraudulent scheme in violation of A.R.S. § 13-1001 and § 13-2310 and conspiracy to commit fraudulent scheme in violation of A.R.S. §§ 13-1003 and 13-2310.

The record shows that at the close of the prosecution’s case and again when the defense rested, the defense counsel moved pursuant to Rule 20, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S., for judgments of acquittal on both charges on the ground that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to warrant a conviction. The jury verdict was returned on July 13,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. OrtizArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Garcia v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. St. ChristopherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Hyder v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. WestArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. WagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  3. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. Maule v. ARIZ. SUPER. COURT FOR MARICOPA CTYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. State v. FelkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API