State v. Wagstaff
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROEB, Judge.
Appellant has brought this appeal from his conviction for child molestation. He has also petitioned this court for review of the trial court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. For clarity, the appeal will be discussed separately from the petition for review.
APPEAL
The facts, taken in a light most favorable to sustaining the verdict below, see, e.g., State v. Olivas, 119 Ariz. 22, 579 P.2d 60 (App.1978), are as follows. In 1984, appellant, his wife and their three children moved to Arizona from Salt Lake City, Utah. In August of 1985, appellant and his wife…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- United States v. Gale Nace and Nathan J. Warren, Sr., United States of America v. Ned Warren, Sr., and Gale NaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- State v. PolitteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- State v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Kincaid v. MangumWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WagstaffArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. BortzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- State v. HerreraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- State v. KrumArizona Supreme Court · 1995
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.