Legal Opinion

Parasco v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 19, 1998No. AC 16512PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STOUGHTON, J.

This is an appeal by the defendants1 after a trial in which they admitted liability and the jury awarded $36,397.25 to the plaintiff for personal injuries sustained when she was struck by a motor vehicle. The vehicle was underinsured, and the plaintiff brought this action against her insurance carriers. The trial court concluded that the verdict was inadequate, set aside the verdict and ordered a new trial if the defendants *673did not agree to an additur of $72,500. The defendants did not agree to the additur and this appeal followed. We reverse the trial court’s additur…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Childs v. BainerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Jacobs v. GoodspeedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Boyce v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Salaman v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  5. Salaman v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Weiss v. BergenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Smith v. LefebreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. Hackling v. Casbro Construction of Rhode IslandConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Snell v. BeamonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. Gladu v. SousaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API