Legal Opinion

Hackling v. Casbro Construction of Rhode Island

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 11, 2001No. AC 20730PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOTI, J.

The plaintiff in this personal injury action, Jeremy Hackling, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his posttrial motions to set aside the jury verdict and for a new trial. The jury found that the plaintiff and the defendant, Casbro Construction of Rhode Island, were each 50 percent at fault for the plaintiffs injuries and awarded damages accordingly. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly denied his posttrial motions because (1) defense counsel engaged in misconduct that denied him the right to a fair trial, (2) the court improperly precluded…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Stewart v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Bhinder v. Sun Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Emerick v. KuhnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. LefebreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. Cousins v. NelsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. Santa Maria v. KleveczConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. White v. Town of WestportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. L'Homme v. Department of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API